

The APR Intercooler System is a OEM-location upgrade that dramatically reduces intake air temperature (IAT), minimizes heat soak, and provides increased performance! The system is a direct bolt-on upgrade that requires no trimming and is recommended at every stage of performance.
APR pioneered the OEM-location direct-replacement intercooler system in 2006. Unfortunately, to the untrained eye, many intercooler designs appear the same. However, effectiveness of the system and overall performance are greatly determined by several key metrics. Alloy selection, end tank design, construction type, fin style, fin density and overall core dimensions must be analyzed and balanced accordingly to deliver class-leading performance. While the OEM’s goal is to create a lightweight, easy to manufacture and inexpensive to produce, cross-platform design capable of supporting factory power levels, APR’s intercooler must be capable of supporting more than double the factory output. Achieving this goal took a multi-step approach focused around intercooler core selection, end tank design and install location.
Cycle through the tabs below to learn more!
The APR Intercooler core is a large bar-and-plate design featuring densely packed staggered and louvered fins. This design offers exceptional cooling while balancing pressure loss across the core, and maintaining critical airflow to the components behind the intercooler system. The core size was appropriately matched to the platform, minimizing pressure drop while leaving adequate space for appropriately designed end tanks. To APR’s mechanical engineering experts, the design represented the ultimate in performance, far exceeding the capabilities of the factory intercooler. To the driver, the result is simple: Repeatable performance, even in the most demanding of situations!
APR’s Engineers paid close attention to the balance between core effectiveness and pressure drop through the core, core style and fin density. With fin density too low, pressure drop decreases dramatically, but typically results in a core incapable of effectively cooling. Likewise, with fin density too great, pressure drop increases dramatically, resulting in the turbocharger working harder, and hotter, to produce the same level of airflow. By fine tuning this often unseen balancing act, as illustrated below, APR’s Engineers were able to maximize performance.
Internal Fin Structure
Number | Type | Fin Type | Fin Density | Pressure Drop | Cooling Effectiveness | Manufacturing Cost | Comments | Recommended |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tube and Fin | Straight Channel | Low | Low | Low | $ | Poor Cooling | Not Recommended |
2 | Bar-and-Plate | Straight Channel | Low | Low | Low | $$ | Poor Cooling | Not Recommended |
3 | Quality Bar-and-Plate | Staggered/Offset | High | Low | High | $$$ | Excellent Cooling | Recommended! |
4 | Overly Dense Bar-and-Plate | Staggered/Offset | High | High | High | $$$ | High pressure drop | Not Recommended |
APR’s Engineers also paid close attention to the balancing act between core effectiveness, pressure drop and space for end tanks through core sizing. With the core too small, pressure drop decreases dramatically, but typically results in a core incapable of effectively cooling. Likewise, with core size too great, pressure drop can increase, resulting in the turbocharger working harder. However, more importantly, with no space for appropriate end tanks, utilization of the core and overall effectiveness of the system diminishes rapidly, negating the benefit of the larger core. APR’s engineers were able to balance each of these characteristics to deliver maximum performance.
System | Core Type | Thickness | Width | Height | Volume | % Less Volume than APR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OEM GTI | Tube and Fin | 1.250" | 24.25" | 16.25" | 492.5 in³ | 78% |
OEM Golf R | Tube and Fin | 1.375" | 24.25" | 16.25" | 541.8 in³ | 62% |
APR | Bar-and-Plate | 2.250" | 24.00" | 16.25" | 877.5 in³ |
The APR intercooler system’s core volume, in terms of external dimensions, is 78% greater than the OEM GTI and 62% greater than the OEM Golf R Intercooler.
Specific References